← Search

Michael Enghauser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 21W–31L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history52 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Tapia
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-10-26 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hal Byrd
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · NNM/Briggs/Adult55&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-01 · NNM/Briggs/Adult55&Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Zanoni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · NNM/Briggs/Adult55&Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darren Hibray
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Hager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-04-11 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-24 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Beltramo
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.9% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 68.4% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams