← Search

Rick Beltramo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 12W–37L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history49 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sajjid Budhwani
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Belianinov
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sajjid Budhwani
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-15 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Davidson
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kammie Kruse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennafer Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Lovedahl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-18 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayo Judge-mikasa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Meadows mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Dent
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-31 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Tapia
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Hohsfield
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 43.3% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 42.8% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 32.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova