← Search

John Medina

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 126W–85L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history211 matches
L
2026-11-02 · NNM Tri-Level Bronze Men - Schloss · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Fredine
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kacie Svet mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kacie Svet mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-27 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Galvis - TCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandeep Panta
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-26 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Galvis - TCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Sussman
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-20 · Adult 40 & Over 3.0M Galvis - TCA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcos Castillo
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · Adult 40 & Over 3.0M Galvis - TCA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Davidson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-13 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Galvis - TCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Craff
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-11 · Adult 40 & Over 3.0M Galvis - TCA · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-08 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1
W
2026-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Holmes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kacie Svet mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
60%
51W–34L · 56.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 46.9% of games
3.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.1% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
36 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova