← Search

Doug Dent

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 35W–48L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history83 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Kollarik
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Kollarik
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Tapia
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Kollarik
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Byrd - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-04 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Beltramo
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-17 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-09 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Beltramo
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Beltramo
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-18 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Rosenthal
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-09 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-09-07 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 47% of games
4.0
50%
14W–14L · 48% of games
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 48.5% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal