← Search

Matthew Ganey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SAINT LOUIS, MO
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 11W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-04-26 · Petruska - BW Legacy (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Siegel
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Petruska - BW Legacy (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Siegel
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Petruska - BW Legacy (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Siegel
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-08-10 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meaghan Harned mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
W
2022-08-02 · Hammond · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristina Mehner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-07-12 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meaghan Harned mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-07-05 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meaghan Harned mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-06-02 · Hammond · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-08-03 · Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Dubberke mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2021-07-29 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Hennies mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2021-07-06 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Hennies mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2021-06-22 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Hennies mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe