← Search

Jacqueline Buck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 36W–54L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Racquet Science (Ransom/Shepler) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Racquet Science (Ransom/Shepler) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Borislav Ivanov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Rechtlich
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Todd
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Rechtlich
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-01 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Goetz
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Henze
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-28 · Criner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Ebert Meyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-05-10 · Criner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dina Scherrer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-10 · Criner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Criner
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-5
W
2024-05-21 · Criner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Taysi
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-14 · Criner/Albrecht (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
38.2%
26W–42L · 46.4% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe