← Search

Audra Bartholomew

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Bloomfield, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 112W–127L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history239 matches
L
2026-10-25 · SCWB-Steiner 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Esther Yang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · SCWB-Steiner 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Spellman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Russell
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-29 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with M Elise Guidos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joelle Mansfield
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Yu
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yumiko Farrell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Wikol
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yumiko Farrell
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50.4%
61W–60L · 49.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.6% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 49% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
40.4%
23W–34L · 45.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer