← Search

Yumiko Farrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Commerce Township, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
359 matches · 203W–156L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history359 matches
W
2026-10-31 · SCWB-Steiner 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Geri Bulka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-30 · SCWB-Farrell 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-5
L
2026-10-25 · SCWB-Farrell 4.0W Fall Singles F · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-3
W
2026-10-17 · SCWB-Steiner 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Geri Bulka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-16 · SCWB-Farrell 4.0W Fall Singles F · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-03 · SCWB-Steiner 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Vania White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rangsiyakorn Garber
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riya Cao
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · FAC-Steiner 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huiping Chen
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Bartholomew
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · FAC-Steiner 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.6% of games
3.5
76.7%
46W–14L · 61.3% of games
4.0
52%
64W–59L · 51% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.6% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
21W–7L · 62.4% of games
8.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.9% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
51.3%
20W–19L · 50.8% of games
9.0mixed
13.6%
3W–19L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
78 matches
#2 Singles
8%
28 matches
#1 Singles
6%
23 matches
#3 Singles
5%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe