← Search

Lilian Strasser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 90W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history192 matches
W
2026-07-28 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Mowbray
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · WESS-Schlecht 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Lambert
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Mick
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann-Marie Neme
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · WESS-Schlecht 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Gibbs
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · WESS-Strasser 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Mick
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · WESS-Strasser 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lora Leslie
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carmen Mollicone
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Klimkowski
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · WESS-Strasser 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Morgan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-30 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Lambert
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rayna Handelman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
47.3%
44W–49L · 47.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55% of games
7.0
46.9%
38W–43L · 48.9% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal