← Search

Rayna Handelman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
White Lake, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 111W–166L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history277 matches
L
2026-11-01 · FAC-Ross 7.0 X 55&O F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-18 · FAC-Ross 7.0 X 55&O F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Shapiro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Gay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-24 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Oderkirk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yvette Diamond
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Oderkirk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Gay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Enright
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilian Strasser
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Prasath Balakrishnan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danielle Smith-Elliott
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50.8%
33W–32L · 51.6% of games
4.0
29.7%
47W–111L · 42.1% of games
7.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.8% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
70 matches
#1 Singles
10%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert