← Search

Sharon Taskin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Easton, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 2W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history21 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Seaside Smashers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Peters
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · Seaside Smashers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David McGregor mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David McGregor mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-29 · Hershey/Long · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika Long
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Green
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
Sandra Brown / Rebecca Thomas
2024-05-15 · Hershey/Long · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Baker
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Mencia
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-14 · Connelly/Walter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Walter
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-31 · Connelly/Walter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francesca Wiseman
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-05-17 · Connelly/Walter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Baker
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Kerxton
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 32.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams