← Search

Amy Abell

— year-end
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2019–2020

Captains: add Amy Abell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2020-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-07-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2020-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Walroth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2020-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Dara Hudson / Julie Jordan
2020-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Ratterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2020-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2019-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marlene Fahlbusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 4-5
L
Judy Dennis / Margaret Brown
2019-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marlene Fahlbusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 0-4
W
Patty Haumesser / Barbara Lee
2019-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 6-2
W
2019-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meg Argo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 3-2
L
2019-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-3
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.8% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova