← Search

Carol Zimmerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 111W–129L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history240 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Ka.Serow55C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Allen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Gentry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with AP Blake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-05-06 · Ca.Zimmerman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debi Collins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-23 · Ca.Zimmerman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayra Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-21 · Ka.Serow65A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Sweitzer
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · Ca.Zimmerman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Serow
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-07 · Ka.Serow65A3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucine Barker
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Ka.Serow65A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Serow
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-26 · Ca.Zimmerman55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Allen
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-17 · Ka.Serow65A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Sweitzer
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-12 · Ca.Zimmerman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Sweitzer
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
3.0
58.3%
60W–43L · 53.3% of games
3.5
17.9%
5W–23L · 40.6% of games
6.5
40.6%
28W–41L · 46% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.8% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert