← Search

Maryjane MacLeod

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Thousand Oaks, CA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 1W–9L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history10 matches
L
2024-09-08 · V-LLW Royal Girlfriends - Leahy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Jepson championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-07 · V-LLW Royal Girlfriends - Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Spraggs championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-12 · V-LLW Royal Girlfriends - Leahy · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Haywood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-28 · V-LLW Royal Girlfriends - Leahy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Bannon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-23 · V-LLW Royal Girlfriends - Leahy · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Leahy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2019-06-02 · V - WE Royal Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-05-25 · V - WE Royal Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2019-04-28 · V - WE Royal Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stella Dumlao-Idea
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2019-04-20 · V - WE Royal Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicky Modglin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2019-04-13 · V - WE Royal Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicky Modglin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 20% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#1 Singles
20%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova