← Search

Steve Barker

— year-end
39 matches · 19W–20L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Steve Barker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2020-11-08 · Hartig/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2020-09-20 · Hartig/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jan-Michael Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2020-03-01 · Schneider (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2020-02-16 · Schneider (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Linden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2020-02-09 · Schneider (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Bahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2020-01-19 · Schneider (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Linden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-01-12 · Schneider (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2020-01-05 · Batdorf/Schneider (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Wyland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2019-12-29 · Batdorf/Schneider (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2019-12-08 · Batdorf/Schneider (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Linden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-4
L
2019-11-24 · Batdorf/Schneider (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Wyland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Shaul Yecheskel / Matt Vannatta
2019-10-27 · Batdorf/Schneider (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Wyland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 65.1% of games
4.5
19%
4W–17L · 41.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams