← Search

John Novatny

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ellisville, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 26W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-10-31 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Arnstein championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-30 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Mainer championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-30 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Mainer championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-04 · Tao-Maack (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Mainer
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Mainer championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-20 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rick Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clinton Vanvalkenburgh
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · STL/Novatny&Tao/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rick Tao
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-29 · STL/Novatny/55 Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Syrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-15 · STL/Novatny/55 Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clinton Vanvalkenburgh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-06-22 · MOValley/Arnstein-Novatny/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eduardo Abilez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-06-15 · MOValley/Arnstein-Novatny/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Hanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
9.0
87%
20W–3L · 63.2% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe