← Search

Helen Jenkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 68W–62L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Jackson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-01 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Ochsner
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corinne Marcus
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-28 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Ochsner
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-24 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Nalty
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-18 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Reiss
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Wolfe
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cordes
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-24 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Freeman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-23 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Ochsner
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-10 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Wolfe
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-28 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Reiss
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 50.6% of games
4.0
50.9%
27W–26L · 50.8% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 60.4% of games
7.5
52%
13W–12L · 49.7% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert