← Search

Erica Reiss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 24W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Farnsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-08 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Jackson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Favrot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · Cordes/18/DIII/TWD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corinne Marcus
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-14 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Moore
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-18 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Jenkins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Moore
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-10 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Nalty
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-03-09 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cordes
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-05 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cordes
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · Cordes/Kallenborn/55/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly McKenzie Perrier
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-02 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Moore
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 49.5% of games
8.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova