← Search

Tyler Hempstead

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 68W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tyler Hempstead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-23 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darcy Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · CSU WHITE · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrea Wallace mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · MLF MAROON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wil Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-02 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Laramore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · CSU WHITE · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kate Allison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · CSU WHITE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Pelletier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · MLF ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darcy Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · MLF MAROON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gordon Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Wil Buchanan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Aaron Phillips championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Adam Coleman / Chris Duncan
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Wil Buchanan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Fields championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.5% of games
4.0
75.7%
28W–9L · 59.9% of games
7.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.3% of games
8.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.7% of games
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert