Teams

MLF MAROON

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-18vs FCCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesTyler Hempstead / Wil Buchanan vs Christian Bachelet / Tidhar Sadeh3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRoyce Grover vs Gregory Gibbs6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Trevino / Jeremy Johnson vs Daniel Veloso Aguila / Robin Wick6-3, 7-5
2026-08-04vs HMTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoyce Grover / Jeff Arnett vs Stu Hoime / Jameel Chohan6-1, 6-3
2026-07-28vs LVTA NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesRoyce Grover / Jeremy Johnson vs Adam Less / Joshua Marty6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Schlicting vs Jonathan Koester6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Arnett / Jason Metzler vs Cory Lynch / Brian Smith2-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs LT SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Hempstead / Gordon Beck vs Mark Hartman / Colin Sprague6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Schlicting vs Michael Baker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeremy Johnson / Jason Metzler vs Peter Corran / Ted Ray6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT SILVER21631084
2MLF MAROON12361281
3HMTC GREEN136613117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Gordon Beck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Benjamin Schlicting
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Wil Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Tyler Hempstead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
David Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Royce Grover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Jeff Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jeremy Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Joe Ashbee
published 4
Jason Metzler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Hempstead + Wil Buchanan7361% games+6.2% vs expected
Royce Grover + Jeff Arnett303 matchesnot enough data
Wil Buchanan + Gordon Beck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gordon Beck
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Benjamin Schlicting
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Wil Buchanan
32W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Tyler Hempstead
68W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
4
David Trevino
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Royce Grover
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Jeff Arnett
23W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Jeremy Johnson
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Joe Ashbee
80W–50L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jason Metzler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.