Teams

LVTA NAVY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-01vs MLF MAROONLost 12
L#1 DoublesJonathan Koester / Adam Less vs Gordon Beck / Jeff Arnett2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs Royce Grover1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEthan Dotson / Jared Petersen vs David Trevino / Jason Metzler6-3, 6-4
2026-08-25vs HMTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Smith / Cory Lynch vs Chris Moore / Dillon Henson3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJosh Achtemeier vs Thomas Munoz7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEthan Dotson / Jonathan Koester vs Jameel Chohan / Michael Robeson3-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs FCCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Marty / Adam Less vs Don Kennedy / Christian Bachelet7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCory Lynch vs Gregory Gibbs6-2, 6-2
2026-07-28vs MLF MAROONWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdam Less / Joshua Marty vs Royce Grover / Jeremy Johnson3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJonathan Koester vs Benjamin Schlicting6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCory Lynch / Brian Smith vs Jeff Arnett / Jason Metzler6-2, 6-1
2026-07-21vs HMTC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Less / Joshua Marty vs Jameel Chohan / Chris Moore6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJonathan Koester vs Dillon Henson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Smith / Cory Lynch vs Richard Penhale / Alan Foss6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cory Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.86
Josh Achtemeier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.86
Jared Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Adam Less
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Joshua Marty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jonathan Koester
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Ethan Dotson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Marty + Adam Less13456% games+0.4% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Adam Less4254% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cory Lynch
32W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
Josh Achtemeier
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jared Petersen
68W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adam Less
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Joshua Marty
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Jonathan Koester
27W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Ethan Dotson
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.