← Search

James McTeague

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Aurora, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 84W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
W
2026-10-18 · NITA E 35M40a Naperville-Esancy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yash Tumpalliwar
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · NITA E 35M40a Naperville-Esancy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael LeBaron
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-03 · NITA E 35M40a Naperville-Esancy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael LeBaron
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-09-19 · NITA F TLM45b Naperville-Podwika · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Maren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-13 · CHI E 55M7.0 5.NTC Esancy Sun 6:30 $25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael LeBaron
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
Default
2026-08-12 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 4.NTC Esancy Wed 7 $24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Lomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-11 · NITA S 35M40d Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-06-03 · CDTA S 55&OM7.0 4.NTC Esancy Wed 7 $24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard McLean
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · NITA S 35M40d Naperville-Esancy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Grimm
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · CDTA W 40&OM3.5 4.Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Esancy
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Esancy
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-2
W
2026-04-18 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Esancy
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60.4%
67W–44L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.9% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 62.7% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King