← Search

Cheryl Ellison-Hargrove

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Antonio, TX
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
56 matches · 21W–35L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history56 matches
L
2026-05-08 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rogelio Cirilo Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · No Hit Sherlock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hope Baker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Konop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-02-19 · AH Mid-court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rogelio Cirilo Jr mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-02-05 · AH Mid-court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rogelio Cirilo Jr mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-15 · Alamo Heights Gold · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Pettit
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-09-17 · Alamo Heights Gold · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2022-08-05 · Alamo Heights TGIF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Cirilo
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2022-06-17 · Alamo Heights TGIF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilya Matos
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-05-21 · Alamo Heights Gold · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-07 · Alamo Heights Gold · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nolette Brell
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-04-02 · Alamo Heights Gold · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nolette Brell
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
46.2%
18W–21L · 47% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe