← Search

Hannah Chouest

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oxford, MS
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 11W–13L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history24 matches
L
2024-04-03 · Nagle - NC - Goose Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vicki Ferguson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-12 · 7.0 18+ Worsham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Szatkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2023-05-30 · 7.0 18+ Worsham · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caden LeBlanc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-02 · 4.0 -NC- 18+ Worsham Spring · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-17 · 4.0 -NC- 18+ Worsham Spring · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-11 · 4.0 -NC- 18+ Worsham Spring · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-09-30 · Flowers-Oxford · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barrie van Cleave
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2021-08-25 · Flowers-Oxford · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mallie Nagle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2020-11-17 · Big fuzzy balls-Oxford · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Beyers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-11-16 · Big fuzzy balls-Oxford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Krisi Allen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2020-11-11 · STFU · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Shows
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2020-11-08 · STFU · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Morgan Winkel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 47% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Singles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal