← Search

Shelly Shows

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oxford, MS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 62W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Rector, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-19 · Rector, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Flowers- NC - Oxford · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Clark championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
Katie Reid / Katelyn Walker
2026-06-07 · Flowers- NC - Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Flowers- NC - Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Flowers championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
Meg Perry / Amy Langdon
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christy Prine championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-2
W
2024-07-18 · Worsham - NC - Goose Creek · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ashley Goldasich
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-07-18 · Thomas-Cohn -NC- GooseCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Goldasich
loading the estimate
0-1
W
2023-07-16 · 8.0 40+ Worsham · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Whitt Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2023-07-10 · Thomas-Cohn -NC- GooseCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Goldasich
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 70.4% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.6% of games
3.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 66.2% of games
4.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.9% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.9% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 74.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer