← Search

Kimberly Harrell

— year-end
128 matches · 96W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Harrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Coffey, Celia · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Maria Rodriguez / Jayme Griffin
2026-09-02 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-26 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elise Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Stacie Rector / Maria Rodriguez
2026-08-23 · Sessums, Joey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellan Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sumner Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Miskelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · Rector, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacie Rector
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Farthing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · Sessums, Joey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellan Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Sessums, Joey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 66% of games
4.0
91.8%
45W–4L · 68.9% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.5% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 57% of games
8.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.9% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 31.7% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
17%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova