← Search

Amy Slade

— year-end
86 matches · 43W–43L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Slade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Coffey, Celia · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · Adams, Amber · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monique Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Adams, Amber · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · Sessums, Joey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daphne Bilbrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Warren, Ellen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McKay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Sessums, Joey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daphne Bilbrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mary Taylor / Susan Jackson
2026-07-08 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.4% of games
4.0
50%
17W–17L · 49.7% of games
7.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 44.6% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer