← Search

Jonathan Sims

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 122W–40L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history162 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Carmody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-12 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anton Borovik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-0
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Sumrall championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Long championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Sumrall championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-05 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anton Borovik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Johnson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holcomb mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holcomb mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holcomb mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Sumrall championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Sumrall championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.2% of games
3.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 62.7% of games
3.5
85%
34W–6L · 63.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.3% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 52.7% of games
7.5
75%
12W–4L · 59.7% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.1% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.7% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams