← Search

Barbara Holcomb

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Purvis, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 148W–59L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history207 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-11 · RCH Asmar · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Cochran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · RCH Asmar · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Olsson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zac Erwin mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Sims mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zac Erwin mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Sims mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Sims mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-20 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-15 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · Black-40’s 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hope Andy championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Boykin championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
13W–13L · 50.2% of games
3.0
70.6%
36W–15L · 62.9% of games
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.8% of games
5.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 65.7% of games
6.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 62.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.8% of games
3.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.9% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams