← Search

Tina Boykin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 117W–69L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history186 matches
W
2026-10-14 · RCH Asmar · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-13 · Stetelman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christa Hataway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-12 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Foster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-11 · RCH Asmar · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Saia Stetelman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-01 · RCH Asmar · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Saia Stetelman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-30 · RCH Asmar · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-22 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Majors
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-20 · Stetelman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christa Hataway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-15 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Majors
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-13 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Rhian Parker championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Rhian Parker championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Holcomb championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.9% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 61% of games
3.5
63.4%
26W–15L · 53.9% of games
4.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 48.9% of games
5.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.4% of games
6.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 62.1% of games
7.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 56% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.7% of games
3.5mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova