← Search

Elizabeth Schwartz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 102W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history171 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Fink 18+ Tatum 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie C Fink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-01 · Fink 18+ Tatum 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie C Fink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-23 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angie Vann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-15 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angie Vann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Dyess
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Fink 18+ Tatum 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly Wise
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Dyess
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-23 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Caves 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Caves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · Caves 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Harper championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 63.2% of games
3.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 54.5% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 55.2% of games
7.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal