← Search

Hannah Gibson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 51W–6L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history57 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Davidson-7.5-18's-OG · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dallas Tanner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with JULIE BAUGH
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with McKenzie Woodard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-17 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Morris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-15 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with McKenzie Woodard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jo Goodin championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Sobiesk championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jo Goodin championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Sobiesk championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-27 · Davidson-7.5-18's-OG · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Mayers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Roseberry-3.5-4.5-Canebrake · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Williamson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Canebrake 18+ 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Jo Goodin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.5% of games
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 78.2% of games
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 71.4% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
12W–0L · 80.6% of games
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 71.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe