← Search

Jeffrey Carmody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 150W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Sims
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Milton - Travel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Holmes championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · Milton - Travel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Holmes championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stan Fisher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with JD Hosemann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alissa Joseph mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alissa Joseph mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Eaton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stan Fisher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lane Clower championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lane Clower championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lane Clower championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.5
77.8%
42W–12L · 59.9% of games
4.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 53.7% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 63.3% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 61.5% of games
4.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 70.3% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#1 Singles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe