← Search

Anna Miskelly

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MADISON, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 111W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-09-22 · Brewer, Elise · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Crystal Glenn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dawn Farthing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-19 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Fiser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Brewer, Elise · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Waldrop
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-02 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nico Forlenza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Gordon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MacKenzie Carmody
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haley Rooks championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haley Rooks championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 73.8% of games
3.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 68.1% of games
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 67.3% of games
4.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 55.9% of games
5.5
100%
8W–0L · 70.5% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 65.7% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 54.5% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 59.8% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.6% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
25 matches
#1 Singles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
12%
16 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King