← Search

MacKenzie Carmody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jackson, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 140W–57L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history197 matches
W
2026-09-22 · Brewer, Elise · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Trussell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grace Nicaud Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Jeffcoat
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Randall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andria Nanney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Brewer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andria Nanney
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tan Do mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Miskelly
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 68.3% of games
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 65% of games
3.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 62.9% of games
4.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 59% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.6% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.6% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.6% of games
2.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
4.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer