← Search

Mary Kate Diltz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 133W–56L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history189 matches
L
2026-09-24 · Watson, Lee Anne · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Watson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · Campbell, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessie Humble
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-15 · Campbell, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madison Curtis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Tubbs championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · Watson, Lee Anne · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Rayborn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · Campbell, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Otto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-01 · Campbell, Leslie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessie Humble
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-20 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Rayborn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Campbell, Leslie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Madison Curtis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Watson, Lee Anne · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Aubrey Davis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Owens, Leslie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Madison Hill
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
81%
34W–8L · 66.9% of games
3.0
79.1%
34W–9L · 61.4% of games
3.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.4% of games
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.1% of games
6.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.9% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.2% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer