← Search

Ashley Howell

— year-end
106 matches · 60W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ashley Howell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
Jennifer Evans / Cindy Page
2026-08-25 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beverly Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Jackson/Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Benefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-6
L
2026-07-14 · Jackson/Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Benefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-8
W
2026-07-14 · Jackson/Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Benefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-4
W
2026-02-26 · Byrd, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-16 · Eaton, Carrie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-12 · Byrd, Katherine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · Bond, Emma · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-09-21 · Amanda Howell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-17 · Bond, Emma · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Mitchell Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-09-10 · Bond, Emma · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Audrey Youngblood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-08-20 · Bond, Emma · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Mitchell Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.4% of games
3.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 57.7% of games
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.2% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 55.8% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.1% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert