← Search

Dawn Farthing

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 121W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-09-21 · Nunnally, Emily · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Emily Nunnally
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joey Sessums
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Delaina Lucus / Hope Jordan
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Harrell championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Harrell championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Harrell championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-09 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emi Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Miskelly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joey Sessums
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emi Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Ramsey, Nikki · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellan Clower
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
82.9%
29W–6L · 67.8% of games
4.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 63.2% of games
4.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.6% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 74.2% of games
8.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 58.4% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams