← Search

Caroline Loveless

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ridgeland, MS
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 57W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history91 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Nunnally, Emily · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with London Breedlove
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Nunnally, Emily · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with London Breedlove
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-28 · Nunnally, Emily · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kathryn Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-14 · Nunnally, Emily · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with AnneMarie Kimball
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Andria Nanney
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Mason
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Andria Nanney
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Mason
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andria Nanney
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-23 · Otto, Jen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lucy Loveless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-08-12 · Otto, Jen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lucy Loveless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-09-19 · Lampton, Ana · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kristen Eley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 54.6% of games
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 50.4% of games
8.5
50%
9W–9L · 52.4% of games
9.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams