← Search

Madison Mahaffey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CANTON, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 83W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history132 matches
W
Default
2026-09-29 · Bailey, Heather · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Tompkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Martin championship
loading the estimate
5-4
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandalin Blanton championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Bailey, Heather · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Bailey, Heather · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Howell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-06 · Bailey, Heather · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · Bailey, Heather · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Martin
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Cialone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-06-25 · McCoy, Landon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niven Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Cialone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Cialone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 72% of games
4.0
58%
29W–21L · 53% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.4% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.6% of games
4.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer