← Search

Kelly Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tupelo, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 107W–18L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history125 matches
W
Default
2026-09-30 · Howell · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elise Mcmasters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement championship
loading the estimate
4-5
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Howell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elise Mcmasters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Lindsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briley Clement
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Default
2026-04-26 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Roberson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
95.5%
21W–1L · 75.5% of games
3.0
90.3%
28W–3L · 74.5% of games
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.3% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 64.6% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 73.3% of games
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 72.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.7% of games
2.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.7% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams