← Search

Candace Browning

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belden, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 148W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history200 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Chapman
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Chapman
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-30 · Bethany Bounds · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Lindsey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-02 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lydia Farmer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Ellis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Bethany Bounds · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carley Johnston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly McWatters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Waldrop mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-13 · Goetsch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cait Shirilla
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Edwards · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley McLellan
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Howell championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 63.1% of games
3.5
100%
13W–0L · 71.8% of games
4.0
69.9%
58W–25L · 55.9% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.5% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.9% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
82.6%
19W–4L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
36 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe