← Search

Shanna Eason

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 131W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-31 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-10-26 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Alexander
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-24 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Johnson
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Dent/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Wood-Wiener
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Dent
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-03 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Trotz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Shipley championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Barrett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-20 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Buckner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-17 · White/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Trotz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-15 · Eason/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Trotz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 58.6% of games
3.5
76.1%
54W–17L · 58.8% of games
4.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 50% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
12W–3L · 61.2% of games
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 55% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59.3% of games
4.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 62.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King