← Search

Virginia Palacio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Germantown, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 93W–87L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history180 matches
L
2026-10-04 · Monistere/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Picha
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · Wolfanger/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jo Picha
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Picha/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Mendoza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jean Ellen Sisson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Dooley
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Beeber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saunders Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saunders Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terrie Dietsch
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Kirk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
57.4%
39W–29L · 55.2% of games
3.5
50%
32W–32L · 52.5% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 35% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#1 Singles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams