Search

Janet Grillis

year-end
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 20252026

Captains: add Janet Grillis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chandni Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Kinney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Halliburton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Toni Carmichael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chandni Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Kinney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with PENNY WILKINS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stephanie Wright / Samantha Towne
2026-06-24 · Flesch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · Kendall/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanna Evalenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · Kendall/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Linebarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.1% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer