← Search

Catie Carter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 136W–89L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history225 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Burbank
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-27 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Burbank
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-19 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Johnston Tayloe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-22 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Johnston Tayloe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Tayloe/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Whitney Hayes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Glasgow/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Bray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Gleysteen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Philips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Langston Scrugham championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · Cooper/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bin Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Darby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lil Rudd
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
4.0
59.4%
60W–41L · 54.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
12W–24L · 44.2% of games
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 50.4% of games
8.5
76%
19W–6L · 61.2% of games
4.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 58.7% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
32 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert