← Search

Dana Bray

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cordova, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 185W–87L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history272 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Bray/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hala Hakim
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-28 · Lang/ Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Baker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon McCalla championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-09-12 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon McCalla championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hala Hakim championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-30 · Lang/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Plosser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · Glasgow/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catie Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
Default
2026-07-27 · McCalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rob Whitsitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · McCalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with BALAJI KRISHNAIAH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams103 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
82.3%
93W–20L · 64.9% of games
4.5
55.8%
48W–38L · 51.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games
8.5
69%
20W–9L · 56.2% of games
4.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
111 matches
#2 Singles
17%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer