← Search

Brooke Parker Justice

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 132W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history169 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Bennett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Savage
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-22 · Bennett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with E'Lane Williams
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-13 · Bennett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with E'Lane Williams
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · Bennett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sammons
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-09 · Washburn/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Day
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · Washburn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Jumet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with E'Lane Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with E'Lane Williams
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Griffith
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Leavell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ragan Washburn
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-13 · Sheahan/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ragan Washburn championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Sheahan/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sammons
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 74.5% of games
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.1% of games
3.5
86%
37W–6L · 64.2% of games
4.0
71.4%
35W–14L · 58.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.3% of games
6.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 72.2% of games
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert