← Search

Jennifer Sammons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 140W–73L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Bennett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sexton
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-27 · Douglas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Isabel Xu
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-15 · Bennett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sexton
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Bennett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Parker Justice
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-02 · Bricken/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Samantha Douglas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Bricken/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isabel Xu
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Savage
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Sheahan/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sexton championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Sheahan/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sexton championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Sheahan/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Parker Justice
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Sheahan/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Sexton
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
75.6%
96W–31L · 59.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 42.4% of games
7.5
76%
19W–6L · 57.1% of games
8.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer