← Search

Grace Bann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cordova, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 98W–160L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history258 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Hyde/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gloria Hicks
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Agatha Asemota
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · Hyde/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gloria Hicks
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-10 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-10-08 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-04 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Rich championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Rich championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Rich championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Rich championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 40.3% of games
3.5
36.5%
46W–80L · 44.4% of games
4.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 40.3% of games
6.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.9% of games
7.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 39.3% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.8% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 29.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
53 matches
#1 Singles
10%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer